Concept Graph

How the concepts hold together

The programme is not a list of separate concepts. Each concept is developed against — and through — the others. The lines below mark the load-bearing connections; each is supported by specific publications.

Click a connection to see the works that develop it. Each connection has a shareable link you can copy or bookmark.

InferentialLicenseJudgment GapSecond-OrderProvenancePartitionThesisEthicalDisclosureComparativeEntitlementFormationPost-MimeticRelationalityEpistemicInfrastructureSystemicFriction

Where disclosure is foreclosed, no judgment can arise — the gap is total.

Supporting publications

  • The Diffuse Void

    Working paperExamines the diffuse configurations in which no addressable party stands where a moral claim would ordinarily land.

  • When Responsibility Fails to Arise

    Working paperDistinguishes cases in which responsibility is refused from cases in which the conditions for responsibility to arise are absent from the outset.

All connections

Each entry links directly to that pair — copy the URL to share a specific connection.

  1. Inferential License×Judgment Gap

    Overreached inference is the mechanism by which the judgment gap opens.

    3 supporting works

  2. Judgment Gap×Second-Order Provenance

    Closing the gap requires provenance not of data but of the orderings that make outputs decisive.

    3 supporting works

  3. Second-Order Provenance×Epistemic Infrastructure

    Normative orderings are sustained by — and inherited from — epistemic infrastructure.

    2 supporting works

  4. Inferential License×Epistemic Infrastructure

    License to infer is granted, revoked, and audited by the surrounding epistemic infrastructure.

    3 supporting works

  5. Partition Thesis×Ethical Disclosure

    Standing does not by itself disclose a claim; disclosure is the prior condition of ordering.

    2 supporting works

  6. Ethical Disclosure×Judgment Gap

    Where disclosure is foreclosed, no judgment can arise — the gap is total.

    2 supporting works

  7. Partition Thesis×Second-Order Provenance

    Ordering disputes are second-order disputes; standing does not settle them.

    2 supporting works

  8. Comparative Entitlement Formation×Post-Mimetic Relationality

    Entitlement forms out of comparison once mimetic relations are infrastructurally routed.

    2 supporting works

  9. Post-Mimetic Relationality×Epistemic Infrastructure

    Post-mimetic relations are held in place by the same infrastructures that constitute knowledge.

    2 supporting works

  10. Comparative Entitlement Formation×Ethical Disclosure

    Platform grievance forecloses the disclosure of the other as an addressable party.

    2 supporting works

  11. Systemic Friction×Judgment Gap

    Removing friction removes the temporal room in which judgment could be exercised.

    2 supporting works

  12. Systemic Friction×Epistemic Infrastructure

    Friction is a load-bearing feature of epistemic infrastructure, not an inefficiency.

    2 supporting works